painting as text

Some quick thoughts in no order of significance:

  • painting as text.  no need for interpretation, it does not visually represent anything but is, itself contained and signifying
  • support/frame are irrelevant other than historical artifact
  • permanence is a myth
  • ordering of compositional elements is unnecessary except as related to self-contained visuality wherein discourses emerge; again, these are not related to words, or even thoughts, but are self-sustained symbols and signs moving towards meaning
  • art is meaningless...which is why it must be meaningful
  • no one is watching
  • i no longer respect systems of constraint: commerce, dissemination, recognition but rather I am interested in systems of liberation: the spatial, the arena of discourse, anonymity, immediacy.  my work has no need for identity or "style"
New approaches now present themselves to me.  I am once again adrift.