Thoughts on "Via Dolorosa": Part 2

Apparizione della Madre (fourth station), oil on canvas

60" x 48", Rico '16

There is an inner light, largely unseen but not truly invisible.  I believe we are born with it.  It starts brightly because it is strong, perhaps not too far from wherever it originates. 

Resilience and transcendence are largely defined after the fact.  They need a baseline against which to be quantified, and the baseline often takes the form of crushing failure, loss, or defeat.  So there can be no true transcendence without profound loss, and loss/failure/defeat are not things to be feared.  Looked at this way, failure (and the like) offers us an opportunity for transcendence.  Resilience in the face of loss and disappointment is what enables us to define ourselves separate and apart from whatever event life throws our way.  Simply put, this is because resilience empowers us to write our own narratives. 

I got interested in the Stations of the Cross when I saw Barnett Newman’s collection of paintings by the same name in the National Gallery.  I love the story because it begins from a place of defeat and moves through agony, humiliation, loss and brutality and eventually to transcendence.   I’ve tried on a few occasions to tackle the theme in a series of paintings, but the time wasn’t right or the work wasn't there.  When I saw the Narthex gallery at St. Peter’s, I knew that if I ever had the opportunity to exhibit there I wanted to do the stations.

My style (if one can call it that) of painting is not about depicting events or trying to visually represent people or places or even actions.  This, combined with the fact that I consider myself secular, set up an interesting set of problems before the first paint ever hit the first surface.

I was born into the era of pop art.  Though I’ve learned to appreciate some of it, overall I find it either nihilistic or cheeky, and these are not the places from which I approach art personally.  I’m unabashed in believing that one of the reasons art exists and continues to endure is because it speaks to the spiritual, the universal, and the primordial.  It has the power to give image to that which exists unseen, voice to that which is unheard, and substance to that which we perceive as intangible.   These things are the measure of a culture long after civilization dissolves and fades away.  Empires rise and fall, but their greatness is only truly assessed after they crumble into dust and we sift out the artifacts of their culture.

What is vital to me is twofold: one, that I have to keep my channel open to the singular expression that is uniquely my own when making the work.  When doing this, the process is less about creating and more about discovering.  This is a much more rewarding and, dare I say, enduring perspective to adopt in the studio when making work.  Two, that the audience make the work their own, truly their own.  The former is achieved through artistic practice; the latter can only be approached through mindfulness and openness without attachment.   I’ve found that attachment is often an impediment to creativity.  Non-attachment frees the soul in a way that transmits energy to the hands in making.


So this body of work is increasingly (as I am writing this in the making of it) about that inner light.  The light which is, at times, enveloped in darkness and the Void, but somehow manages to reach us and reach others through us.  As I continue to make these paintings I am experiencing unexpected emotional depths and changing perceptions. 

Thoughts on "Via Dolorosa": Part 1

Main Street Studio, April 17, 2016

"Via Dolorosa" is a street within Old Jerusalem believed to be the route walked by Jesus on the way to crucifixion.  The stations of the cross mark the journey, and to many Christians this is an intensely moving, spiritually profound symbolic visual journey.  As a secular person, I find (like so much in the various holy books) the metaphor of this "painful way" to be very touching and relevant, even taken out of its literal/historical context.  The 14 stations, which in many ways mirror the hero's journey (which Joseph Campbell discussed in his writings and interviews), represent a transformative movement from the everyday realm into the transcendent realm.  The miraculous resurrection, with all do respect to my believer friends, is not the part of the narrative that I find interesting.  So I end with station 14, entombment.  

In delving into a passionate and admittedly sensitive topic, I wanted to do so with respect but also with artistic authenticity.  I'm taking liberty with some of the stations' names, and reinterpreting the overall journey through a secular lens.  Good stories endure.  They are subject to new insights and updated tellings as they age, and it is my belief that such practices do not diminish or dilute or deride the original narratives; on the contrary, they may breathe new life into them.

Working on this show is itself a transformative experience.  I've found myself very moved at times working on the paintings.  As my first solo exhibition in NYC and as a cohesive body of work, I am, quite expectedly, growing as an artist as I make the work.  I may have started from a very determined, clear space of intent, but as I go on I feel less as though I'm creating and more as if I'm discovering.

The work is taking quantum leaps along the way.  Originally, I wanted to start chronologically and name the paintings as I progressed, but I've realized this is not to be.  I will have to produce all 14 paintings before I decide which is which and in what order.  

Giving voice to things is a way of self-liberation.  Giving voice to this body of work is exercising many demons and long-held pain, and maybe that shows in the paintings and maybe it doesn't.  In the end, I hope I can produce a significant body of work that touches people and sparks dialogue.


progress

studio view, April 2016


No  particular order to thoughts today, worked in the studio this morning and to-date have completed 5 stations, likely 1-4 and 6.  Crisp morning, overcast, Dizzy on the speakers, paint, solitude.  Strange that something done in isolation becomes social and shared and interactive.  Odd that a static image can be thought of as interactive, but paintings give back and, in their own way respond.

Context, certainly this is one way art becomes altered.  This is why some art shines in the gallery and why some does not, but why most is vibrant in the studio.  People like seeing art in the artist's studio because it has original context; and yet, it's seldom made with the intent of remaining in the studio.  Chew on that.

Strangely, I am hoping that events this week will lead to a major interruption.  That I'll be back on the night shift in the studio, because there's an urgency to the nights.  The internal dialogue is strong right now.

Two more stations should be done this week. Stations 7 & 8 are in early stages.  I'm 10 months out from shipping and am well on my way to have two of the walls completed.  I know the wall over the stairwell is going to be challenging and there will be fits and starts and possibly even casualties (not the human kind).  I don't even want to think about trying to install those 5 paintings.  The idea of hiring a crew is becoming more appealing.