what we see

7th station, in progress, studio

I've been invited to participate in a group show curated by an incredible artist and acquaintance at U Dayton (I'm big in Ohio, ladies and gentlemen, what can I say?).   The assignment was simple, but it's gotten me thinking about appropriation and images and seeing.  Painting, and really all art-making I can think of, involves an altered perception.  Not the kind you get from substances, but an altered sense of looking/listening/experiencing a thing.  It's taken me decades to fully grasp that I see the world fundamentally differently than most people; that I experience the world around me profoundly differently.  So if I take an image and rotate it and reverse it and filter it, it becomes a thing it was not before.  My active experience and interaction alters the thing itself, and thus forever changes the perceptions of others as well.

It's said that we don't really know what art is, but we know it when we see it.  I'd add to that Jerry Saltz's famous quip, "art can be for anybody, it's just not for everybody."   The viewer has a responsibility in encountering art.  I really don't think a painting is done until someone has seen it.  For me, seeing people see the work gives me closure.  I'm not responsible for what they take away, but I'm very interested in what they bring.

If you think about it, every one of us is alone in the universe.  We are experiencing life and our surroundings in a unique and solitary way.  "Blue" to me isn't necessarily blue to you, and so on.  Artists train themselves to trust this.  We invite it in and use it, and we attempt to bring those perceptions to a table of universality through the personal.  I think artists are sharing people.  It makes it especially hard for us to understand those who do not share.

Over time, I've developed a way of using my medium to facilitate what I see and communicate it to others.  I eschew the common notion of inspiration, but truth be told I walk around in a constant state of being inspired by everything.  I'll stop and take pictures of clouds, or puddles because I find them remarkable.  All that looking has brought about a way of seeing; or is it the other way around? 

I'm long overdue for a trip to NYC.  Good conversation is hard to find in this town.  


the fourth station

Apparizione della Madre (fourth station) [in progress], 
acrylic and oil on canvas, 72" x 72", Rico '14


The weekends seem shorter, the winter drags on.  I work with constraints (mostly time) but increasingly without limits.  I'm fairly far along on four paintings now, and I saw them all hung for the first time in the studio today.  They are strong, and there is a long way to do.

A quiet night fades into a busy week.  More stretchers to build -always we begin, again.

condemnation

condanna (first station) [in progress], acrylic and oil on canvas
72" x 72", Rico '14


A good night last night, the cold winds made it a closed door session.  There are times when I feel that I am so utterly far removed from everyone and everything; that this tiny town may as well be an island or Mars.  Working alone has taught me self-reliance and to trust in my visions.  I am in my place of uncertainty.  Each painting is a sustained effort, a surprise, and provides me brief satisfaction when I'm able to pull it off as I had imagined it.   

The black paintings are incredibly difficult to document.  What looks grey in the photo above is a matte black.  As one moves through the room and views these paintings from different angles, the composition recedes and emerges and fades.  These pieces are painted with a space in mind, and when I have two or three more under my belt, I will begin that process.

I've worked heavily from sketchbooks for this series.  I have an arc of story through the composition of each painting.  I know what they look like in my mind now.




the first failure

il primo fallimento (third station)
acrylic and oil on canvas, 72" x 72", Rico '14

There's a favorite cultural myth that we cling to above all others; that man pulls himself up by his own bootstraps in isolation from the world around him and achieves greatness/wealth/fame by merit and hard work alone.  The claimed rewards proof, -irrefutable, that he alone is deserving of the overflowing cup from which he now drinks deeply.  We worship celebrity for this very reason; celebrity being both our gods and everyman.  It plays into the very same mythos as the impoverished, inner city youth who rises to professional fame and wealth in sports through hours of dedication and practice against all odds.  We need to believe in meritocracy if only to keep us from losing hope in our fragile puritan ethos and desperate belief in fairness.  In reality there are far fewer slices of pie than can ever be enough for all of us, and most; no matter how talented or brilliant or dedicated they may be, will never rise from obscurity.

So we lost an amazing actor yesterday; an artist.  There will be many talking heads paraded across everyone's television screens and op-ed columns saying why we should mourn or why we should pity or condemn.  There were, no doubt, sermons.  There will be "serious" talk about addiction and help for addicts, the victims of their own hedonism or escapism fueled by the overwhelming pressures of their fortune; good or ill.  Many people who have never so much as smoked a joint will decry the wretched cultural scourge of illegal drugs; equating heroin with abusing Adderall, blaming rap culture and immigrants and of course, Obama.

Can we instead take a breath for a moment and recognize that a man is dead?  People die every day,  each death is tragic; each has some back story that, unlike the high-profile death of a celebrity, will never be told.  To some degree, most of us will die with our pants at our ankles (metaphorical speaking).  Death doesn't wait until it's convenient.  Death is the price for life, and everyone pays the same fee when the check comes to the table.  I'm far more inclined to view the death of a six-day-old baby as tragic than someone my age who couldn't wrestle his demons to the ground, but the real truth about addiction is that the users are seldom the victims anyway; the victims are almost always the families.  Those left behind.  It is those people who deserve respect, privacy in their mourning, and compassion.  The dead don't care what we have to say about them, or when we grow tired of speaking of them at all.

I've seen friends go down the rabbit holes of crack and heroin.  It's ugly and deeply saddening, and there is a moment, right before they go under when you're still reaching for them and trying to do everything you can to pull them out.  In the very next moment you realize they will pull you under too, and you salvage what you can, step back and hope they make it; and promise yourself you'll be there when they do.  Sometimes you can be.  But not every time.

The christian's prophet said, "let he who is without sin cast the first stone."  Implicit in that statement is that no stones be thrown at all, because who among us is blameless?  Who among us hasn't failed?  We may have the presence of mind to not shoot horse, but that doesn't mean we won't die behind the wheel for any number of equally-preventable and similarly banal reasons.  It doesn't mean we are superior.  It only means we had the opportunities to make different choices, and somehow, maybe even in spite of ourselves, we acted on those opportunities.  I won't claim innocence when it comes to drugs.  I'm fortunate to have a peculiar immunity toward addiction to some substances that others try once and it seals their fate.  Lucky me; but it owes far more to biochemistry than moral fortitude let me tell you.  And while heroin is a peculiar journey during which at one point everyone knows how it will likely end, when you're in it, it may not seem so clear and rational and clean.  I've overcome some demons, so have many good friends.  But others, equally dear, are not here today, and that doesn't make them weak or bad people so much as it makes them human and frail and more like me than I can sometimes own up to to care to admit.

As I think about the stations of the cross, what intrigues me is that it is the story of a man who knew how his story was going to play out.  He could have opted out at any time, walked away, lived a long life or (if you buy their theology) simply stepped off this mortal plane and onto another.  The most human thing in the world to do is to avoid pain.  The compelling arc of story is that he faced his fate with eyes wide open and in so doing provided an example of how each of us can do so as well.  Some are born to discover new worlds, create research that will forever change the world we live in, be great artists, composers, actors or world leaders.  Some are born to be great parents, courageous teachers, or simply play the supporting role in other people's lives while never seeing the spotlight themselves.  Whatever our path, whatever it is that we were born for, whatever gifts we have been born with, we must grab that destiny and run with it.  Live it for all that it's worth and squeeze every ounce of sweat, blood, spit and sex out of it until we collapse in a lumped, bruised heap at death's door.  I believe we are born to live, even if we cannot escape death.  The when and perhaps the how of dying isn't up to us; but we make our own terms when it comes to how we live.

These paintings are an existential journey for me.  I don't have any answers; I'm too busy asking questions.


one winter more

one winter more before the northward crossing
acrylic and oil on canvas, 2014 Rico

The process of painting passes through dozens of paintings.  For every mark, from the very first one, the pictorial space is shaped and changed.  The artist practices a detached discernment, but must free himself from judgement.  Openness and awareness must be preserved; the act of seeing is paramount.  

Things occur in the process.  Work comes from work.  The simple change from white to black has profoundly changed my perceptions and interactions with the canvas.  As I prepare to take this concept large, I'm reminded that I purposely constricted myself in square canvases.  The square is inflexible.  It is also pure and, surprisingly, spiritual.  I'm reminded of Malevich, from whom I now have a much deeper appreciation.  Indeed the association with the icon is asserting itself in this work, and that was by design but unexpected in terms of effectiveness.  

A quick break and then back to lay down another layer of acrylic so that I can hit these with oil tomorrow.  This modest 10" x 10" canvas retains the large scale.  I'll dive into the 6' x 6' canvases with abandon.